Define service boundaries, integration patterns, data ownership, APIs, and event-driven architecture for cloud-native systems.
We will review your current situation and recommend a practical next step.
Pricing is provided after a discovery call, based on architecture complexity, integrations, environments, access requirements, and timeline.
Organizations modernizing monolithic applications often pursue microservices to improve scalability and delivery speed, but the transition can increase complexity when service boundaries, data ownership, integration patterns, deployment practices, and operational governance are not clearly defined from the beginning.
UCT helps define a realistic microservices architecture roadmap based on business domains, API boundaries, events, data ownership, caching, and cloud deployment patterns.
Designed to provide a practical result quickly, without unnecessary complexity.
No. Microservices are not always the right answer. UCT evaluates whether microservices, modular monolith, APIs, or hybrid patterns are the best fit.
Yes. Service boundary definition is one of the most important parts of the architecture review.
Yes. Kafka and event-driven patterns can be included when they fit the business and technical requirements.
You receive a practical roadmap with recommended service boundaries, integration patterns, risks, and implementation phases.
Book a free discovery call and we will identify the best next step for your business.